Friday 4 September 2009

His Phoniest Hour

Prime Minister Gordon Brown dismissed claims today that he had forgotten the 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War Two. Some are asking why Britain is not following the lead of Russia and Poland in commemorating a key moment in European history. There is speculation that Brown fears that he might be compared to Winston Churchill who was one of the greatest Prime Ministers and war leaders in British history. Brown's record is less impressive.

It is 70 years since Britain declared war on Germany, heralding the start of World War II. At 11am on September 3, 1939 the Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain broadcast the announcement on radio. Chamberlain of course was the man responsible for appeasing Hitler and is often characterised as a ditherer, something close to Mr Brown's heart. So perhaps unfavourable comparisons with both leaders were ultimately what encouraged him to overlook any commemoration.

That said, Mr Brown later set the record straight. "I was indeed afraid that I might be compared to Churchill, but not for the reasons that people suspect." A Brown aide proceeded to clarify this statement: No10, it seems, had learnt that yet another third rate revisionist had been "trying to flog his new book" by stating that Churchill was a deeply flawed monster, who was utterly wrong to push for war and should have continued down the path of the appeaser Chamberlain. Said the aide: "Mr Brown could never tolerate comparison with someone like that... A warmonger, that is."

22 comments:

  1. It makes you puke. There are still assholes like William Rees-Mogg claiming in the Times that appeasement was the best course of action.
    Wonder what these appeasers would have done when Hitler, becoming even more powerful, made demands on certain outlying parts of the British Empire.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it's true: A lot of these crap Historians simply attack Churchill to make a name for themselves. They might think that they have a grasp of history. They sure don't have a grasp of psychology

    ReplyDelete
  3. Outlying parts of the Empire?
    I think that that is pretty optimistic...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Some people are allowed to have a different take on history you know - like seeing the point of appeasement. Or is that too democratic for you?

    ReplyDelete
  5. What about the people who agitate about the horrors of Dresden but hardly mention the London Blitz or Coventry?
    The liberal agenda is not a pretty one sometimes

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anything you can do, we can do better... We had more appeasers than you.
    Joseph Kennedy was among them before the war

    ReplyDelete
  7. The sad thing about pacifists is that they have no defence... literally

    ReplyDelete
  8. I read the Rees-Mogg article. He lived through the period (I think). How can he have supported appeasement?
    Wouldn't his wealthy family have worried about their 'assets' in the far flung reaches (if nothing else)???

    ReplyDelete
  9. Isn't this about Brown in reality?
    What kind of asshole hires an idiot like Ainworth as Defence Sec?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ghost of Christmas Past4 September 2009 at 22:06

    "If you're not a liberal when you're 20, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative when you're 40, you have no head."

    ReplyDelete
  11. Not necessarily a Churchill (related) quote... Francois Guisot: "Not to be a republican at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head."

    ReplyDelete
  12. You know you're getting older, when the politicians start looking dumber...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Errrrm.... Georges Clemenceau (1841-1929): "Not to be a socialist at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head."

    ReplyDelete
  14. As George Bernard Shaw said, one who is not a socialist at 20 has no heart, and one who remains a socialist at 40 has no head.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yeah, what the hell is going on with Ainsworth?
    It looks like a repetition of the Des Brown situation. A farcical appointment.
    Brown is trying to make the Defence post appear pointless by appointing useless men.
    Although you could say that there was a pointless man at the Treasury, then a pointless man at No10. Called Gordon Brown.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ainsworthless is superb. Don't knock him.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Knock knock.
    Who's there?
    Bob.
    Bob who?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Joking apart, why is there no commem for 3rd Sept?
    Brown is not one to run away from a photo op.
    What is the reason?

    ReplyDelete
  19. reason doth never prosper for if it prosper then none dare call it reason

    ReplyDelete
  20. Really sad when you hear conservatives saying that Churchill was wrong and Chamberlain was right.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Theorists are all over the place nowadays

    ReplyDelete
  22. Armchair variety

    ReplyDelete