Conservative leader David Cameron has been responding to criticism of his lack of preparation for the aftermath of a general election. Commentators on both left and right have criticised Cameron and shadow chancellor George Osborne recently for lacking a clear coherent economic strategy in the event of 'regime change'.
Mr Cameron admitted that the Conservatives had been primarily "focused" on how to deal with issues caused by the general election, but that that did not necessarily mean that the aftermath was not properly planned for.
"There has been an immense amount of Conservative post-election planning, but we must accept that the post-election situation might well be different to the one that we are currently expecting."
Standing by his intention to rid Britain of an "arrogant, incompetent leader who has deceived his people and bled his country dry," Cameron hinted that 'regime change' was perhaps in itself sufficient justification for wanting to attack Gordon. He concluded: "But if people ask me about the morality of fighting Gordon, I will state once more: His is an appalling regime. And I will make no apologies for liberating the country from his great clunking fist."
Monday, 8 February 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
War it may be but it ain't shock and awe, for sure.
ReplyDeleteC'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la guerre. Actuellement, ce n'est pas magnifique
ReplyDeleteDon't forget your balaclava David.
ReplyDeleteOEs like myself need only tea and a stiff upper lip to defeat the likes of Mad Gordon
ReplyDeleteIt is not true to say that I have weapons of self-destruction. And if I did it would take me longer than 45 mins to work out how to use them.
ReplyDeleteWar is diplomacy by other means. Unfortunately Saddam ate all the actual diplomats we sent him so we were left with no other option.
ReplyDeleteI would like to refute allegations that I have met with the Argentine President and asked her to kindly re-invade the Falklands now that oil has been discovered.
ReplyDeleteThis would be irresponsible and the last thing that I would want before an election. Honest.
However I will say to the fragrant President Kirchner that were she to want an amicable confrontation, then in the words of the peace-loving Dubya, "BRING IT ON!"
I thought you were in Greece today offering them your treasured economic wisdom
ReplyDeleteIndeed I will be in Greece today and bearing the Greeks the gifts of my economic insight
ReplyDeleteNow that really does sound like a Trojan Horse.
ReplyDeleteStop misquoting me: What I meant was, diplomacy makes it look like you don't really want war.
ReplyDeleteThen you invade the fuckers anyway (if you'll pardon my German).
I too am attacking Gordon for the sake of regime change. But I do not have to plan for the aftermath luckily
ReplyDeleteSo you don't know who to vote for, you hate them all... so what do you do? Vote for the devil you know or the devil you don't?
ReplyDeleteCan you please take your Mr Brown away? He keep giving us his stupid advice and we no want, innit?
ReplyDeleteCan I make it clear: I will reform the system as and when it becomes an issue (in the media).
ReplyDeleteWhy not better poll ratings for Cameron? Maybe devil you know is preferable?
ReplyDeleteMaybe people are wise to the Mr Fixit routine, things getting better etc.
ReplyDeleteThey bought it in 97, but its going to be a long time before they buy the whole Mr Clean routine again
So no one party is going to race ahead
You know, funny thing about diplomacy is that its a whole lot more effective if its backed up by the ability to wage total war.
ReplyDeleteSad thing about the liberal left is they're not good at negotiation.
ReplyDeleteIts all either indoctrination or rolling over.
Standing by allies, good. But it ain't so bad to get something back in return. Is it?
So, will we want politicians who cry or those who maintain the stiff upper lip?
ReplyDeleteCampbell won a 100,000 womens' votes with his tears. Good move.
If only the men in ancient Greece had cried.
ReplyDeleteLysistrata and her ladies would have given in much earlier if the men had shed a few tears when they went to war... and afterwards of course.
Is that it?