Saturday, 17 October 2009

An MP writes

An MP's lot is not a happy one. We are way down the popularity stakes. Probably somewhere near bankers, journalists, lawyers, estate agents, bloggers, parking wardens, dustbin snoops, bloggers, mortgage brokers, train operators, other commuters on those trains, tourists, stars of reality TV, BBC executives, and last but not least, microbloggers. All people going about their daily business. All people who are loathed for what they do.

In fact everywhere you look nowadays, you see someone that you hate. Someone that you love to hate, want to hate, need to hate. Let's face it, we need something or somebody to rant about. It allows us momentarily to escape our own pathetic lives, with our vain aspirations, our frustrated ambitions. It allows us to blame for all our misery all those other people who got off their backsides and made something of their lives. And yes, you loved them while their stars shined, but you hate them now that they've shown themselves to be human.

But to some extent it is much, much worse for MPs. We never asked for more than we received, for more than what we felt we'd earned in the execution of our duties. At least not at the time, we didn't. If we claimed for expenses, then we only claimed what the claims office approved. Nothing more, nothing less. And let's face it, people of our calibre could have earned a hell of a lot more by working in the private sector, say in the now much maligned City of London.

The institution of parliament is being battered on all sides. Even a lawyer's injunction appears to outweigh the Bill of Rights that says that MPs have the freedom to ask questions in the House and that those questions can be freely disseminated. Newspapers, ordinary taxpayers are enraged at the activities of the house, and are telling us they are in no uncertain terms. We are indeed under seige.

So, where is all this anger leading, one can only ask? Surely not to a place that will profit this great country of ours with its noble customs, its respected institutions, its hard won freedoms.

I ask you then, from the bottom of my heart: Look kindly upon the MPs when they face the draconian response to the expenses scandal that they now face. No-one, surely, can look upon the Legg report without feeling a modicum of sympathy for our beleagured MPs? No-one can behold the inconsistencies, the inaccuracies, the iniquity of his findings without thinking: This Legg fellow is going just a bit too far. Shouldn't this Legg fellow slow down just a bit? After all, MPs are not that bad.

Because, the way I see it... that was the whole point of this report.... Surely?
-

12 comments:

  1. Yes, and what happened to all those plans that party leaders were going to implement?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The report didn't even nab the bad asses who made six figure sums by home flipping.
    Could anyone really write a report that bad?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Legg's report might have been expected to elicit sympathy, but I don't detect any let up in the anger when I flick through the comments sections of the blogs and newspapers

    ReplyDelete
  4. None of this is surprising. Enquiries are alway set up to soften people's anger - to make them think that somebody is doing something about the outrage.

    ReplyDelete
  5. On the bright side, the election may be too close to call come next Spring. Governments always do better in elections than mid-term. If the Lib Dems get enough votes they could hold the balance of power in a hung parliament. And that way you might get the kind of reforms you want.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is good for Cameron. It'll give him a chance to clear out the old duffers who threaten to give him a hard time on Europe

    ReplyDelete
  7. Legg's an establishment figure. Plus ca change!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Isn't it about time that they started investigating the Lords? There appears to be a massive amount of corruption going on there. What about the recent reports on Laud Paul?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Also, none of this would ever have come out, had the c**ts managed to confound FOI moves.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Is this guy for real? 'Iniquity of his findings'?
    What could be more iniquitous than trying to suppress the details of MPs expenses in the first place?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am a house cleaner myself, and I did wonder how much Legg reckons a cleaner's time and effort is worth. I think that what Brown paid for cleaning was agency fees... It would be nice if we got paid like that

    ReplyDelete
  12. Can someone tell me what has changed for MPs since the expenses story originally broke?
    They still seem to be living the life of Riley.

    ReplyDelete